On Nov 28, 2007 3:02 PM, Alec Conroy <alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 11/28/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Nov 28, 2007 1:22 PM, Alec Conroy
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
It would
have been impossible to assess Durova's judgment (and lack
thereof) without actually seeing the evidence.
Who made you her judge and jury? The action has resulted in an ArbCom
case, the ArbCom is assessing it.
The community is the judge and jury of every admin action.
Particularly when there is an Request for Comments from the community.
Remember us-- the community? Every admin is theoretically supposed
to have our trust?
The community can comment without seeing personal e-mails, and the RfC
became moot when the RFAR was opened.
She has,
supposedly,
threatened to sue the foundation for copyright violation is the email
is published on-wiki, and that is a risk the foundation does not want
to take.
Has she? I wasn't aware of that.
Yeah-- supposedly foundation employee Bastique removed the material
based on Durova's copyright claims.
Where did Bastique say that Durova threatened to sue the foundation?
Besides, Durova has been repeatedly asked for
permission to publish
the email on wiki, and has yet to grant it-- forcing anyone who wants
to speak intelligently about this subject to visit Wikitruth.
Oddly enough, the reading of that e-mail has not seemed to produce that result.