I added a question to the RFA.
Your comment that it's "pleasing" that it's turning into a debate on
the
system rather than your nomination worries me a bit because it means your
nomination could be considered a violation of WP:POINT to get this
discussion going, but I'll assume good faith for now. If you think the
current RFA process doesn't work, I believe submitting a new process rather
than nominating yourself using the process you dislike is the way to go,
IMO.
Mgm
On 3/30/07, Earle Martin <wikipedia(a)downlode.org> wrote:
Some of you may recall that a few months back I had a go at the RfA
process (and failed, of course [1]). Well, I'm demonstrating again
that I clearly don't know what's good for me:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Requests_for_adminship/Earle_Martin_2
I'm losing, of course, but this time it's turning into a big
discussion between the pro-RfA-system and anti-RfA-system camps. This
is pleasing. While I'm not explicitly asking for your votes (although
I certainly wouldn't say no to them), any replies to comments on the
page would be of interest, for policy discussion's sake.
[1]
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/htdig/wikien-l/2006-October/055827.html
--
Earle Martin
http://downlode.org/
http://purl.org/net/earlemartin/
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l