On 3 May 2010 19:25, Gregory Maxwell gmaxwell@gmail.com wrote:
(I know I'm being repetitive on this point, but I'm going to continue making it at least until people start arguing that it shouldn't be done rather than ignoring it or mistakenly believing that it isn't possible)
I'll say that I don't think it should be done, because it's basically lying to the casual editor - giving them the impression they have edited and their work has gone live, when it hasn't.
It might allow us to present a more polished front, but I don't think deliberately misrepresenting what happens to the casual editor is a good idea.
- d.