On 19 April 2012 15:38, David Gerard dgerard@gmail.com wrote:
On 19 April 2012 15:34, Charles Matthews charles.r.matthews@ntlworld.com wrote:
Those people, who do not have WP's best interests at heart, are always arguing for a disconnect between the letter and spirit of policy, because they have no interest at all in the spirit.
Well, yes. The entire point of this paper is to demand a more gameable system.
So the nuanced point would be that my model might need revision, if a
credible group of "Benthamites" (sorry, I'm stuck in about 1820 here) emerged who could make the case for a new codification of policy. This week's Signpost article on paid editing is at least a straw in the wind.
Charles