oh really, so the inclusion of the three talmuds on the discussion of
zionism is not a useful edit.
the inclusion of famous chinese muslims, discussion of the chinese flag and
its reference to minorities, and inclusion of the number of chinese muslims
is not a useful edit
and perhaps a reference to the xiongnu roots of turkic people was also not a
Neither were the laws passed in the 13th century leading up to the spanish
inquisition useful edits either
the fact that you only choose to concentrate on a small part, is a problem
just like your citing my inclusion of alan harts book 'zionism the real
enemy of jews' in his page was considered copyright even though it met every
single criteria wikipedia lays down for 'fair use'.
Admit it, you banned me because any balanced view of zionism is not
acceptable to you, only pro zionism is, and so all those who attempt to make
the zionist page a NPOV should be banned indefinately on his first ever ban
due to trumped up charges and false accusations.
From: jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com>
Reply-To: English Wikipedia <wikien-l(a)Wikipedia.org>
To: "English Wikipedia" <wikien-l(a)wikipedia.org>
Subject: Re: [WikiEN-l] blocked for a week for these edits
Date: Mon, 22 May 2006 22:38:57 -0400
On 5/22/06, Ryan Delaney <ryan.delaney(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/22/06, Philip Welch
Imagine if we had editors who belonged to the KKK as well as large
numbers of black editors. Still don't see the problem?
Nope, and we've been around and around on this on the mailing list
People who make good edits are welcome to do so,
Right. Which, of course, was not the case here; quite the opposite in
fact, as there is no evidence of even a single "good edit".
WikiEN-l mailing list
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
Are you using the latest version of MSN Messenger? Download MSN Messenger
7.5 today! http://join.msn.com/messenger/overview