On 5/30/07, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 30/05/07, The Mangoe <the.mangoe(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
Be that as
it may, an entire post of mine was deleted because I tried to cite the
actual contents of WR in the attack sites discussion. Just call me
Youssarian.
They only removed your posts so as to help demonstrate the unity of
opinion on the matter. Of course. That's why BADSITES isn't a failed
policy.
Unity of whose opinion? The only principle I saw being applied was
that there didn't need to be new policy because they could already
delete such links on the basis of the ArbCom statement. Plenty of
people disagree with that assertion.