jayjg wrote:
No, I'm just rejecting all attempts to frame this as something it isn't. It's been a veritable straw man army today, but I will not let even one pass.
Except for your own, that is. I, too, am rejecting all attempts to frame my arguments as something they aren't. You are deliberately trying to avoid the core issue of the debate, being that, while there is certainly consensus for common-sense removal of links to actual personal *attacks* (and related content such as the personal identity of users), the consensus for outright bans to entire websites just isn't there, and for good reason.