Fred Bauder <fredbaud(a)ctelco.net> wrote: On May 2, 2006, at 10:25 AM, Cheney Shill
This regards Undue weight part of NPOV:
Sometimes the quality of the sources may differ substantially with
one source representing scholarly opinion, the other reflecting
I definitely agree. However, that's not the problem in this scenario. I didn't
intend this to be an RfA exam test question. From the responses I've gotten so far, I
probably should clarify, but it also shows the great deal of ambiguity I mentioned
regarding determining the majority/minority POV.
*View Moo has 3 sources that support it.
*View Bark has 15 sources that support it.
Under the assumptions that the sources are all independent of each other, all of equal
quality, and they have already been discussed thoroughly and agreed upon as the sources
that should be used to write a section of an article, which, if either, is the majority
view that will be presented to the greatest extent in the section? Should either not be
Blab-away for as little as 1¢/min. Make PC-to-Phone Calls using Yahoo! Messenger with