On 2/22/08, Riana <wiki.riana(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Seriously though, just like you'd expect a
picture of someone masturbating
on the [[Masturbation]] article, you should definitely expect pictures of
*several* people masturbating in the Commons category. There are no
surprises. Unless someone put Tubgirl in the sitenotice again.
Why? I wouldn't expect a picture of someone masturbating if I looked
it up in some other encyclopaedia, say Britannica. A drawing, perhaps.
Enough to convey the idea. Full graphic gorey detail? No thanks.
I'd support a content filter like Flickr has, but
I know people will yell
about censorship. However, the number of complaints that come through on
OTRS about this sort of thing should make us realise that it's a bit of a
God only knows how a content filter is construed as censorship.