On Mon, Jul 27, 2009 at 11:45 AM, Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
My own take on the deletionist/inclusionist divide (which,
admittedly, has little if anything to do with Wikipedia's
inclusion policies as currently prescribed) is to ask: would
anyone, anywhere in the world (other than the author) ever be
interested in reading an encyclopedic treatment of this topic?
(And in the case of Bo the first dog, the answer is pretty
clearly "yes".)
I recently checked Wikipedia for an article on my local library, and found
that it was deleted. If Wikipedia isn't "too" deletionist, then it's
"improperly" deletionist.
C'mon, a library isn't notable?