On 5/17/06, maru dubshinki <marudubshinki(a)gmail.com> wrote:
You didn't cite in the intro the
"exceptionally dense collection" claim. :)
True. I threw that in to avoid being a hypocrit when I say all
articles should claim notability. :) I'll try and fix that.
But that's pretty good. Ideally, from my
standpoint, those references
in the bottom would contain not just the source information, but the
actual quotes you were using, so one does not need to pore over the
article/long research paper/whatever.
Ah yeah. That may be the only convenient way to quote long web pages,
where you don't have page numbers to point the reader to the relevant
section, actually.
For an example of what I sort of mean, see my
[[Encyclopedia of the
Brethren of Purity]]:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Encyclopedia_of_the_Brethren_of_Purity
How come you aren't using <ref> tags? Because of the wordiness of the
footnotes?
Steve