On 5/30/07, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
So you're saying that if WR were actually notable, and if we had an
article on it, then that would justify having a link to the page. When
else would we link to it, outside of that unlikely circumstance?
If the site was notable enough for inclusion, then yes, it should have a
link back, the same as any other web enterprise. That's not even really a
question, is it?
For other circumstances, it was alleged by some in Gracenote's RFA that he
was a Wikipedia Review poster. Where was the evidence? Without evidence, it
was basically poisoning the well, and that poor guy's name. E-defamation, or
wikifamation, I suppose.