Delirium wrote:
Jimmy Wales wrote:
And it's better to have nothing on a marginal
topic than to have
something that is embarassing to us in any way at all.
I strongly disagree with that; eventually producing a good encyclopedia
ought to take precedence over immediately gaining good PR (or avoiding
bad PR).
Eventually producing a good encyclopedia is _exactly_ what I'm talking
about. That's why it's better to delete crap than keep it. Having tons
and tons of junk articles does not help us create a good quality
encyclopedia; it encourages more of the same.
--Jimbo