Here's an idea: why not noindex BLPs while they're being considered on AfD. We get the best of both worlds, since as the article isn't the number one ghit, there's no need to speedy non-outrageous articles. I guess we'd also need to noindex the AfDs themselves.
David
On 27/05/07, Anthony wikimail@inbox.org wrote:
On 5/27/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
Andrew Gray wrote:
On 27/05/07, Ray Saintonge saintonge@telus.net wrote:
That wouldn't really solve the problem at all - it's quite possible
to
have a stable-but-crap article. "Stable" only really means "pretty likely it doesn't say Joe is Gay anywhere"...
If you apply that limitation to stable versions you are right. Stable versioning, however, should be developed to the point where it can do
a
lot more.
Mmmm.... then we're really talking reviewed versions, or finalised versions, or revision rating structures, or something like that.
Yes, whatever we choose to call it.
[[Silver bullet]]s, maybe? _______________________________________________ WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l