Clear case of editcountitis.
Jimbo does work to promote Wikipedia outside of things that are recorded in
edit counters.
This is a clear example of why edit counts don't say everything.
Mgm
On 2/1/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
1890 edits at a very low edit rate. Little
evidence of vandle fighting
and has
failed to create any featured articles. The
distibution of edits is
pretty good although
a little low on article space. Would probably get
through RFA but
would not be completely clear cut.
In another 30 edits, that could be describing me :)
Seriously though:
Username Jimbo Wales
Total edits 1890
Image uploads 9 (7 cur, 2 old)
Distinct pages edited 727
Edits/page (avg) 2.60
First edit 2001-03-27 20:47:31
Articles 417
Talk 211
User 128
User talk 809
Project 198
Project talk 62
1 in 4 edits actually in the article space, and twice as many on user
pages? Not to mention 128 edits to his own user page? I'm not sure
what measure you use to judge "pretty good" edit distribution - the
guy is clearly not here to create an encyclopaedia :)
Steve (who has 18 times more edits in the template namespace, so must
be 18 times cooler...)
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l