On Nov 29, 2007 11:03 PM, Alec Conroy
<alecmconroy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
2. Although the email does not EXPLICILTLY propose blocking !!, it
certainly accuses him of blockable behavior. Any reasonable person
who read it in any depth would should have anticipated a block or else
warned her about the block.
I think it is quite possible that a reasonable person could have read it and
assumed it was a springboard for further checking, rather than a proposal
for an immediate block.
3. Acording to Durova, she had "in
depth" discussions with "five
sleuths" who "enthusaistically endorsed" the block. According to
multiple sources, these "in depth" discussions didn not occur on the
cyberstalking list-- they occured elsewhere-- either on the
investigation list, through email, or somwhere else.
No, I think you're going further than the evidence there. Durova did not say
she had discussed blocking with these five, as the quoted passage shows. She
said that their reaction to what she sent them was "positive to
enthusiastic". She has not said that she sent them a proposal to block.
I still get a strong sense that there is much less to this than meets the
eye.
--
Sam Blacketer
London E15
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
< this response, but there Durova strongly suggests that five people
endorsed her reasoning after reviewing it in detail, if not explicitly
the block.
Sorry for any confusion I've caused.
WilyD