Jayjg wrote:
On 7/2/07, Steve Summit <scs(a)eskimo.com> wrote:
It's about trying to get BADSITES
resurrected, under the guise of
the "attack sites" section within WP:NPA, using MONGO as a precedent.
No, Steve, we're not doing "A WITCH, A WITCH" commentary any more.
We're moving on to sensible discussion.
I'm sorry my statement might have sounded to some like the
ravings of a paranoid conspiracy theorist, and I almost said so
in advance. But in all seriousness: what is the difference
between BADSITES and
...Linking to attack sites is not permitted and doing so
repeatedly may result in a block.
The ArbCom has ruled that "[a] website that engages in
the practice of publishing private information concerning
the identities of Wikipedia participants will be regarded
as an attack site whose pages should not be linked to
from Wikipedia pages under any circumstances," and that
"[l]inks to attack sites may be removed by any user; such
removals are exempt from 3RR. Deliberately linking to an
attack site may be grounds for blocking."
(That's from
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Wikipedia:
No_personal_attacks&oldid=133377921, from May 25.)