2009/9/22 Carcharoth <carcharothwp(a)googlemail.com>om>:
Some you would expect there to be enough material for
this sort of
treatment. Others less so. I like the idea of doing this sort of thing
for very long biographcal articles, but seeing how it has developed in
some cases, I'm not so sure. There are some articles I think should
not be treated this way. The material out there is enough for one
article, and that should be enough.
I think a good analogy here is explicit general history articles. We
view it as quite normal to go from
[[History of something]]
and then, when it gets too large, split it out into
[[History of something]]
* [[History of something in the Bronze Age]]
* [[History of something in the Middle Ages]]
* [[History of something in World War I]]
etc.
--
- Andrew Gray
andrew.gray(a)dunelm.org.uk