We don't need to put every nonsense article on Votes for Deletion. And besides, it's spelled wrong.
Zoe
Daniel Ehrenberg <littledanehren@yahoo.com> wrote:
Wasn't Infogramation supposed to report it to
[[Wikipedia:Votes for Deletion]] before deleting it? I
think it's a valid topic and deserves an article.
Sure, it doesn't have an article in Britannica, but so
what? It's still information. It's not POV. I
acknologed in my recreating of the article that it
might be a joke.
--- Brion Vibber wrote:
> According to archives, it was created at 20:35 by
> 68.115.30.162,
> containing this text:
>
> A little-known religion embracing Hormel Foods'
> [[SPAM]] as its god. The
> actual creator of Spammism is unknown.
>
> It was then deleted:
>
> 20:54 Apr 17, 2003 Infrogmation deleted "Spammism"
> (Sillyness "A
> little-known religion embracing Hormel Foods' SPAM
> as its god. The
> actual creator of Spammism is unknown.")
>
> See:
> http://www.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Deletion_log
>
> -- brion vibber (brion @ pobox.com)
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> WikiEN-l mailing list
> WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org
> http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
__________________________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
Yahoo! Platinum - Watch CBS' NCAA March Madness, live on your desktop!
http://platinum.yahoo.com
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l@wikipedia.org
http://www.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
Do you Yahoo!?
The New Yahoo! Search - Faster. Easier. Bingo.