On Mon, Mar 28, 2011 at 11:05 AM, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 28 March 2011 15:34, Scott MacDonald doc.wikipedia@ntlworld.com wrote:
E-mail OTRS and you're dealing with a non-editorial non-authority, who might not believe who you are, and probably won't accept your own testimony as other than worthless. Even if you convince the OTRS person, he might well get reverted by someone who can't see the e-mails.
However if OTRS can't it through we are dealing with a situation more complex than setting the record strait
Now, along comes another way of people setting the record straight, and you reject it because a) it doesn't comply with policy b) people may pay $1,000 to impersonate someone c) you choose to be cynical about their identity checking d) it doesn't make sense to you.
The kind of people who might normally be expect to spend that kind of amount on reputation management have better and cheaper options.
To wit, why not pay $1,000 to get someone else to deal with OTRS for you? For $1,000 surely you can hire an expert in the OTRS process to draft up a letter, have a notary to come to your house, notarize your signature on the document, and scan it in.