As to the "natural monopoly" question, well, there is this resource:
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Natural_monopoly
There are some markets where network effects and very high entry costs, such
as building infrastructure, make it very difficult for competitors to arise.
Regarding Wikipedia, the financial costs may not be prohibitive, but the
social capital necessary to create a serious rival may be (just ask Larry
Sanger). And the network effect should be fairly plain; Wikipedia is the
place to be. (And I do not underestimate Google here.)
I do think alternative wiki projects that seek to fill "gaps" created by
Wikipedia's choice not to include some types of information stand the best
chance of success -- going head-to-head with this entrenched incumbent is
foolhardy, unless the Wikipedia community falls apart and the site falls
into total disrepair -- even then I think there is so much value here
already that it's far more likely Wikipedia would be resuscitated, than any
rival wiki encyclopedia taking the lead.
On Sun, Aug 29, 2010 at 7:58 PM, David Gerard <dgerard(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 30 August 2010 00:36, Ray Saintonge
<saintonge(a)telus.net> wrote:
Mathematics is an a atypical subject area. Even
those who are most
prolific in their output of wrong opinions will admit that they are
clueless when it comes to mathematics.
How's the crank problem in mathematics on WP?
- d.
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l