On 11/28/07, geni geniice@gmail.com wrote:
On 28/11/2007, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
If an admin refuses to publicly reveal the reasons for blocking someone, one alternative is to reveal them to the Arbitration Committee, which she did.
Can you show that there is community consensus in support of this power grab?
"power grab" is a little too Assuming Bad Faith for my taste, but it's clear Durova's secret evidence that neither the community nor the admins at large could review was a substantial departure from previous history.
And it's also quite clear from the RFC that the community didn't care for it one bit.