On 11/28/07, geni <geniice(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 28/11/2007, jayjg <jayjg99(a)gmail.com> wrote:
If an admin refuses to publicly reveal the
reasons for blocking
someone, one alternative is to reveal them to the Arbitration
Committee, which she did.
Can you show that there is community consensus in support of this power grab?
"power grab" is a little too Assuming Bad Faith for my taste, but it's
clear Durova's secret evidence that neither the community nor the
admins at large could review was a substantial departure from previous
history.
And it's also quite clear from the RFC that the community didn't care
for it one bit.