On 2/3/06, The Cunctator <cunctator(a)gmail.com> wrote:
"Semi-protection" is also something that bothers me no end. As does
the concept of needing to "semi-protect" talk pages.
On this subject, see my recent edit on talk:George W. Bush.
Although vandalism has been slashed by semi-protection on that
article, non-vandalism edits also seem to be down by about 60%. Does
that mean that semi-protection is wrong for George W. Bush? I think
the jury is still out, but it appears that there is considerable
collateral damage associated with semi-protection.