Actually I'm evaluating them on their appropriateness for a mailing list. A discussion that would be perfectly in order on wiki http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:DRV#Principal_purpose_.E2.80.93_chall... looks more like off wiki canvassing to me.
May I suggest that we close this thread or focus it on the issue of how we prevent this list for being used for forum shopping and canvassing?
WereSpielChequers
On 25 May 2011 23:56, Richard Farmbrough richard@farmbrough.co.uk wrote:
Presumably we are evaluating the arguments that are not /ad hominem /on their merits, rather than on the /ad hominem/ basis that their author elsewhere makes /ad hominem /attacks?
RMF
On 25/05/2011 22:38, David Gerard wrote:
See, at this point you completely blew your credibility in this discussion by slipping into ad hominem. That's where you wiped out all gains from your previous posts in the thread. Don't do this if you want to be taken seriously.
- d.
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l