--- Tomos at Wikipedia wiki_tomos@hotmail.com wrote:
There is another solution to this problem in discussion at Japanese Wikipedia and Wiktionary. It is a bit easier than the migration to GNU Free Content License, though I would love to see it happen soon.
We may introduce another license - so-called "intra-site public domain license" or "intra-wikimedia public domain license." What the license says is something like this:
"by contributing to Wikipedia, you allow others to use your contributions within Wikipedia's projects as if they are in public domain."
While I think this does reflect actual practice, I'm not sure if it is at all legal or practical (esp since IANAL). For example, I would assume that any current GFDL-only article could not be edited under such a dual license until the authors of the GFDL-only article agree to dual license their work.
Why? Because the edited article is a derivative work of the original and since the original was only under the GFDL, the derivative work can only be under the GFDL. The only way to really change that is to get permission from all the article's authors to add another license.
-- Daniel Mayer (aka mav)
__________________________________ Do you Yahoo!? Friends. Fun. Try the all-new Yahoo! Messenger. http://messenger.yahoo.com/