There's nothing wrong with removing the word "terrorist". It's a loaded
word, and probably doesn't belong in the plain text of any article other than
[[terrorism]] itself.
On the
other hand, if a prominent figure or body has a relevant quote, and a user
suppresses that quote for no other purpose than to eliminate the word
"terrorist", then this is censorship and shouldn't be
encouraged.
We can
say:
*
Clinton called the 9/11 hijackings "terrorism" and helped provide bi-partisan
support for a military campaign to punish the "terrorists"
responsible.
This
way, it's not the Wikipedia which says that the hijackings or crashes or
civilian deaths are acts of terror, but a particular, well-known spokesman for a
large and influential group.
Ed
Poor
Ancient Wikipedian