-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Well, I mean, what difference does it make? I guess it probably should have a link, but, honestly, with the number of Wikipedia images being reused these days, I don't think it would be worth it to attempt to track them all down... - --Unionhawk
Carcharoth wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Casey Browncbrown1023.ml@gmail.com wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Andrew Turveyandrewrturvey@googlemail.com wrote:
<snip>
I've seen (source:Wikipedia) quoted a few times on media pictures now.
Well, that's the media. :-) They're used to being able to just say random things like "source: Reuters" that make no sense whatsoever.
That's true. But even print sources *should* give a full credit line if asked to do so.
That should ideally include the name of the photographer, and that it is GFDL content. Technically, I'm not sure if Wikipedia even needs to be mentioned (we are just the middleman), but I'm sure there is some clause somewhere that requires it.
Carcharoth
WikiEN-l mailing list WikiEN-l@lists.wikimedia.org To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit: https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l