-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Well, I mean, what difference does it make? I guess it probably should
have a link, but, honestly, with the number of Wikipedia images being
reused these days, I don't think it would be worth it to attempt to
track them all down...
- --Unionhawk
Carcharoth wrote:
On Fri, Jun 5, 2009 at 1:59 AM, Casey
Brown<cbrown1023.ml(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Thu, Jun 4, 2009 at 5:41 PM, Andrew
Turvey<andrewrturvey(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
<snip>
I've
seen (source:Wikipedia) quoted a few times on media pictures now.
Well, that's
the media. :-) They're used to being able to just say
random things like "source: Reuters" that make no sense whatsoever.
That's true. But even print sources *should* give a full credit line
if asked to do so.
That should ideally include the name of the photographer, and that it
is GFDL content. Technically, I'm not sure if Wikipedia even needs to
be mentioned (we are just the middleman), but I'm sure there is some
clause somewhere that requires it.
Carcharoth
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)lists.wikimedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkovEGMACgkQSPTq06lEuY/rowCfZZt1Us2u14MmRW6kiJhTMQH/
L68An0EE9DYfTxCON+Ob/ZLWNj/wyiWR
=7/Yt
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----