On 2/10/06, Steve Bennett <stevage(a)gmail.com> wrote:
I don't see why the RC patrol should not tag it as crap, if, indeed,
it was crap. I don't think Sean is disputing that his article was
crap, just that he was planning on making it better. If he doesn't put
an in progress tag on it (and I've never actually seen one, to be
honest), then it's not unreasonable that he has to fish his
half-finished crap out of the bin before he can keep turning it into a
masterpiece.
Steve
Actually, it wasn't crap. Have a look at the stub that was {{afd}}'d
http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Cart00ney&oldid=39073156
It's tagged as a stub, it's referenced - it's far from being an FA, but
it's
nowhere near "crap" (not in a general Wikipedia context)
Ian