I was acting out of good faith, and I now admit listcruft was not the best
term.
However, I refuse to admit I wasn't following [[WP:AGF]] or [[WP:CIVIL]].
Thanks.
On 5/2/06, Kelly Martin <kelly.lynn.martin(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 5/2/06, Joe Anderson <computerjoe.mailinglist(a)googlemail.com> wrote:
I accept that some may see it as uncivil, but I
for one do not.
In my opinion calling content contributed in good faith by our valued
contributors "cruft" is incivil. It sends the clear message that
their contributions, and by extension themselves, are valueless. Why
can't you just say "Not suitable for inclusion in the encyclopedia due
to limited scope of interest"?
Kelly
_______________________________________________
WikiEN-l mailing list
WikiEN-l(a)Wikipedia.org
To unsubscribe from this mailing list, visit:
http://mail.wikipedia.org/mailman/listinfo/wikien-l
--
Joe Anderson
[[User:Computerjoe]] on en, fr, de, simple, Meta and Commons.