Guy Chapman aka JzG wrote:
On Fri, 20 Oct 2006 10:22:35 -0600, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
If you want to
propose being equally "ruthless" for fictional characters I want to see
a reason that's just as strong.
Sure. They are the number one source of original research, banned by
policy, and these articles have misled countless editors into
believing that (a) "I read it on teh internets" is adequate sourcing
and (b) we should tailor policy on verifiability, original research
and neutrality to ensure that these articles are not impacted.
All of which is already covered by the same policies policy in both
fictional character and living-person-biography. The only thing that BLP
does is make the enforcement of our original research and verification
policies more _urgent_ on living-person-biography articles, it doesn't
put any additional constraints on the material that can be found within.
The articles are held to the same content standards already, it's the
urgency in applying those standards that I'm questioning here. Why is it
just as urgent to deal with OR on fictional character articles as it is
to deal with OR on living person articles?