On 2/8/06, Sam Korn <smoddy(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On 2/8/06, Jay Converse <supermo0(a)gmail.com>
wrote:
I thought that's what started this whole
mess.
Please read through the ArbCom's proposed decision to get a full
decision on the matter.
--
Sam
The decision on the matter is not the same as what prompted discussion of
the matter. My point was that what started this whole mess was someone
getting blocked for the simple reason that they were a pedophile. Am I
missing something here?
Pete Mackay said:
*Oh, an editor can BE a paedophile. We don't mind that. It's just that he or
she can't SAY it on their userpage. That pisses everyone off and attracts
criticism.*
**
This is what I'm worried about, and the precedent I was mentioning. All of
a sudden, userpages now need to be politically correct, or you risk a
block. That is, if this precedent does get set.
--
Jay Converse
I'm not stupid, just selectively ignorant.