Andrew Gray wrote:
I think a good analogy here is explicit general
history articles. We
view it as quite normal to go from
[[History of something]]
and then, when it gets too large, split it out into
[[History of something]]
* [[History of something in the Bronze Age]]
I know this is mildly on a tangent, but I find it interesting
nevertheless...
Wouldn't that most likely be:
* [[Prehistory & history of something in the Bronze Age]] ?
Or something like that...
IOW, doesn't the Bronze age kind-of straddle the boundary
between prehistory and history?
* [[History of something in the Middle Ages]]
* [[History of something in World War I]]
etc.
PS. Feel free to moderate me if this is found to be too far
from being of the topic of this list ;-D
Yours,
Jussi-Ville Heiskanen