On Sun, 2 Aug 2009, Ray Saintonge wrote:
So what if there have been tens of thousands of papers
on the
Rorschachs! The geocentric universe was impervious to criticism for
much longer.
the incomes of those psychologists who are in denial about their game of
follow-the-leader. NPOV is contrary to such occult practices.
Oh... and does this mean that if you were to be convinced that showing the
blots does cause harm, you would then support their removal? Or is your
position more absolutist, and you don't really care about whether they
cause harm or not?
The harm that they inflict on the self-esteem of psychologists
is hardly
enough harm to justify such action. Showing that something can cause
harm, is quite different than showing that it does.
That's a strange dodging of the question.
If you were convinced that showing the blots causes harm to potential
patients, rather than to psychologists' self-esteem, would you then support
the removal of the blots?