On 21/02/2008, Raphael Wegmann <raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
James Farrar schrieb:
On 21/02/2008, Raphael Wegmann
<raphael(a)psi.co.at> wrote:
Thomas Dalton schrieb:
> Don't even think about adding such a
show/hide feature to
>
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Muhammad
>
> I got a Level 3 Vandalism warning template on my talk page for doing so.
> WP:AGF seems to be another policy admins don't have to follow.
You did something there is quite clearly not a consensus for - that's
either bad faith, or very bad judgement, your choice.
Did you ever bother to look at
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Muhammad/images
There are 8 pages full of complaints about the Muhammad images.
I'd conclude, that there is indeed a strong disagreement
to that alleged "consensus".
"No consensus for action" != "consensus for no action".
I agree.
In which case, you should also appreciate that making a change on a
highly-controversial subject when there is no consensus or such a
change is, at best, bad judgement.