Phil Sandifer wrote:
Obviously this involves a bit of a paradigm shift, in that we would be linking to projects that are not, strictly speaking, sister projects.
I'm not sure it'd be a good idea to use "official-looking" link templates like the ones for Wikisource etc. to link to projects that don't operate under the fundamental policies of Wikipedia like that. I suspect it'll blur the line between NPOV/Verifiable/non-original-research Wikipedia content and whatever content standards they've got over there.
A set of templates with a different look-and-feel and perhaps an appropriate disclaimer, on the other hand, might be better. We often already have plain old external links anyway, though, so I'm not sure it's needed.