On 5/17/06, James D. Forrester <james(a)jdforrester.org> wrote:
I see your 27 references and raise you 34 - [[Andrew Adonis, Baron
Adonis]] (very much needs many more references, though).
Since we're offering mutual criticism, it's probably better in your
footnotes that the footnote read as the date/page/newspaper of the article,
rather than just "Times article on...", isn't it?
For URLs I'm starting to develop a style whether I either leave the URL bare
or with a title coming from the page itself, followed by any commentary I
have to make on
it:[www.company.com Company Inc] - corporate website;
www.magicmap.com - has maps relating to subject.
Also you're still using the old referencing format - Cyde Wey has a magic
script to convert. I am very impressed at your categorisation though :)
Steve