--- steve vertigo <utilitymuffinresearch(a)yahoo.com>
wrote:
So, regardless of that particular situation, ( I
think
Robert had a point)
you should
never feel intimidated or forced into positions that
require you to
compromise your
dignity. Those who make attempts to cause you feel
that way are to be
looked upon with
some distaste, if not moderated by sanction.
Best.
-Steve
I'll be frank Steve.
RK has the intend to merge all Gaia article into only
one, then to keep only what is scientific in the
article (ie Margulis and Lovelock), and to avoid the
accusation of text destruction, he intends either
* to create again some new articles where he would put
what he considers old and irrelevant stuff (such as
Gaia theories (precedents) - making the claim
unification in one article in the only way, a joke
* to disperse every old and irrelevant stuff to other
articles where frankly they will get lost (such as the
non scientific view of these theories)
I think it is wrong for all the reasons I have
previously mentionned. Gaia theories is not only about
science, and it is not because a theory was set more
than 50 years ago that it is irrelevant.
I notice you mention RK has a point. But which point
do you mean ? Do you think he has a point when
suggesting to delete and redirect the Gaia Hypothesis
article ? Do you think he has a point in removing
everything that it out of scientific acceptance ? That
is a very different point.
I am very strongly against the second. I don't think
either that RK and I will ever solve that disagreement
because RK decided that any real discussion with me
was useless.
I would have appreciated that someone help us decide
what to do and given good arguments that would make
weight. Because all what I offered is just not
listened too. And all what I get in terms of
discussion is bullshit. Sample : the last email RK
sent and
http://www.wikipedia.org/w/wiki.phtml?title=Talk:Gaia_theory&diff=0&…
Now, since no discussion is humanly possible between
the two of us, and if no one is helping us here, we
will just enter in an ugly cycle of edition/reversion
till one dies or go on holiday (after which point we
can resume).
This is a very sad way to spent time. But so be it.
__________________________________
Do you Yahoo!?
SBC Yahoo! DSL - Now only $29.95 per month!
http://sbc.yahoo.com