On Fri, 31 Jul 2009, Ray Saintonge wrote:
So what if there have been tens of thousands of papers
on the
Rorschachs! The geocentric universe was impervious to criticism for
much longer.
the incomes of those psychologists who are in denial about their game of
follow-the-leader. NPOV is contrary to such occult practices.
Oh... and does this mean that if you were to be convinced that showing the
blots does cause harm, you would then support their removal? Or is your
position more absolutist, and you don't really care about whether they
cause harm or not?
If the tests are truly scientific they will be just as
scientific when exposed to open criticism.
You're equivocating on the meaning of "scientific" here--if it means
"be more
able to properly use them on other people", yes. If it means "be more able
to properly use them on himself", no.