As a rule, for Christian images we have had historical depictions from
various eras and traditions, which generally do a good job of
illustrating the varieties and development of such images. An obvious
problem with the Islamic articles is that we need corresponding images
to tell the truth about the development and variety of prohibitions
against images. I personally think that the "western depictions"
section of the "depictions" article could be dispensed with, but
there's room for disagreement there. Otherwise the use of images of
Mohammad seem relevant and helpful.