Fred Bauder wrote:
Results vary when you complain, some problems are dealt with, some
work themselves out, some are ignored, but I have never seen a
vengeful or paranoid attitude from our central leadership.
Depends on who you count among the "central leadership", I suppose. I'm
not trying to single her out here, but I was struct by the juxtaposition
of your comment above and a message just left by Kelly Martin (who seems
to be "in the know" on this current issue) at [[WP:1WW]:
"... Eloquence deciding that he's entitled to unilaterally reverse
without discussion a protection imposed by Danny, one of most trusted
administrators. That was wheel warring. He deserves to be desysoped (and
was desysoped, although that punishment, while originally imposed by
Jimbo, was subsequently reversed by Jimbo for reasons that frankly make
no sense to me) for that."
So, let's see:
* That nice hot-button word "unilaterally". It wasn't more than a few
months ago when the unwashed hordes were screaming it at Kelly herself.
* Desysoping (and prosumably blocking) are apparently now punitive, not
preventative.
* "I am sure Erik will not do anything bad" frankly makes no sense to her.
I'm sorry to say this, but, all in all, that comment sounds pretty
nasty. Maybe not "vengeful or paranoid", but certainly very stressed
out and high-handed, with a good amount of zero tolerance and "assume
bad faith" thrown in. Maybe I'm reading too much into this paragraph,
but it sure sounds as if someone is in urgent need of a vacation here.
Mind you, when the smoke clears, I'd really like to know what caused all
this panic at the office in the first place -- did someone hold Jimbo at
gunpoint while demanding that the articles be removed, or what?
Just another admin without all the pieces of the puzzle,
--
Ilmari Karonen