There's been some talk about the use of citations as sources and evidence. I think we are treading on very thin ice here. For example, I am not a big fan of George W. Bush. I even have two books, "The Bush Dyslexicon" by Mark Crispin Miller and "The Lies of George W. Bush" by David Corn, which lambast him based entirely on his quotations. While I happen to like the books, I would hardly base an article on them--if I did, I would be attacked for bias and POV, even though all of the quotations are well documented. We have to be very careful here.