On Mon, 23 May 2011, The Cunctator wrote:
The reason: Wikipedia is on the Internet. If Wikipedia has an article about something whose promoter specifically intends to spread it on the Internet, it is impossible to separate reporting from participation. It's a loophole in the definition of neutrality that doing things which help one side of a dispute doesn't break neutrality, simply because our intentions are neutral--even though our effects are not.
I agree. Let's remove all content on Wikipedia about the Internet.
"Is about the Internet" and "is mainly an Internet promotional campaign" aren't the same thing.
Someone might write a book and want it promoted on the Internet, but the fact that it's being promoted on the Internet is way down on the list of important facts about that book.