Rick wrote:
I object solely on the grounds that it is not the arbcom's responsibility to create policy.
I don't yet see what you think is new about this.
And that is what they're doing. Even if I got everything I wanted, I would still object. But let me also say that I disagree with this option, because it's given Guanaco the ability to suddenly go wild and retroactively unblock EVERY SINGLE PERSON from the past whose reason for blocking doesn't match these unapproved criteria.
Guanaco, or any other sysop, has always had the ability to do this.
--Jimbo