On 3 May 2010 21:18, phoebe ayers phoebe.wiki@gmail.com wrote:
- problem: we don't really know how this is going to pan out
3a. I see a lot of conflicting rhetoric about why we want flaggedrevs and what its role is. Indeed, if the goal is to promote wikipedia as more accurate (tm), then I see no special problem about notifying people that their edits are reviewed -- as Anthony says some might welcome it. If we want it to be an invisible process, part of the mysterious inner workings of the site along with template markup and RFCs, then Greg's idea makes more sense.
Oh, are there plans for email notifications and so forth? For anons too?
- d.