On 11/27/07, jayjg jayjg99@gmail.com wrote:
So now, in addition to the two aforementioned lists, there's some other set of people "colluding" privately off-wiki to take action based on e-mails to the lists? O.K., let's assume for the moment that this bizarrely bad-faith theory is true. What on earth does it have to do with Wikipedia any more? Wikipedians privately e-mail each other hundreds, perhaps thousands of times a day. What do you propose to do about that?
For starters:
I propose that they show the community and/or the full arbcom all the emails that led to the erroneous blocks, so we can see if the endorsers behavior & judgment needs to be examined as well.
That seems pretty simple, yes?
Alec