I think that photos, which are intended to make a specific point, should not be uploaded
to Wikipedia unless they have been previously published by a disinterested, reputable 3rd
party.
Flikr.com, weblogs, partisan political web sites (dailykos, freerepublic, etc) and such
are not acceptable, but commercial news organizations and commericial publishers and to a
lesser extent, non-profits would be ok. There is simply too much opportunity out there to
stage photos, for example:
Supporters of Candidate A take Candidate B's signs and make a big mess in a parking
lot with them and leave also a lot of trash like water bottles and sandwich wrappers....
the Wiki caption for this reads, "trash left behind after local rally for B".
Clearly it's a staged photo intended to make a point. If the control parameter of
"intended to make a point" is not enforced, the excuse regarding the above
scenario would be "I found the trash & signs in the parking lot and merely
snapped the photo". Such assertions could not be disproved, opening a pandora's
box of scheming opporunities.
No virus found in this outgoing message.
Checked by AVG Free Edition.
Version: 7.1.361 / Virus Database: 267.12.6/151 - Release Date: 10/28/2005