Matt R wrote:
--- Tim Starling wrote:
Unfortunately it seems most programmers on Wikipedia would rather think of excuses, complain about the lack of progress and file bug reports.
There's an unfortunate tendency on Wikipedia to suppose that if you identify a problem that you can fix, then you have an obligation to fix it. Even if you have the capability, there is no moral imperative for volunteers to do anything at all on Wikipedia, and documenting a problem is already a positive contribution, albeit a comparatively minor one. Of course, to grumble or whine about a problem that you've identified is churlish, as you have no right to expect that others fix things on your behalf.
But to get to the point: I'm very grateful to the developers. I would quite like to hack on Mediawiki myself some day, but right now I prefer to spend my time contributing to the content of articles -- this is not an *excuse*; this is a choice, and I (only mildly!) resent any such implication.
I'm sorry if I caused offence, I just wanted to impress on everyone that Wikipedia has barely any developers. If you're ever wondering why some feature hasn't been written yet, it's because there's been no-one around to write it. Most of the active developers seem to be more interested writing features for a general audience than for Wikimedia projects. There's more editors on the Old English Wikipedia than there are developers overall. Maybe Matt doesn't want to help, and that's fine. I get the feeling Gerrit doesn't either. But is there anyone? Every second Wikipedian seems to know a programming language. We just need, say, two or three developers willing to put in a few hours per week.
-- Tim Starling