On 29/09/06, David Russell <webmaster(a)davidarussell.co.uk> wrote:
Phil Sandifer wrote:
> Baloney. MoS is a hellhole of process - exactly
what Good Articles
> were made to get around. Good Articles need to be pretty darn good -
> not perfectly adhere to an absurd bit of process that grew
> organically in a manner similar to kudzu.
Er... if Good Articles were meant to get around MoS
then why is citation
of sources one of the Good Article criteria?
Because it failed in its attempt to be a lightweight parallel process.
- d.