On 11/10/06, Jossi Fresco <jossifresco(a)mac.com> wrote:
What may work for [[Spoo]] may not work for
The main issue here is if we are dealing with a controversial topic,
a biography of a living person, or an ongoing enterprise. In these
cases, the need for reliable sources is paramount. In the case of
Spoo, if we do not have the article 100% verifiable to reliable
sources, nobody will be harmed, really.
I think we could all agree it varies with subject area. That's one of
the problems with WP:RS - it attempts a one-size-fits-all solution
that doesn't vary per subject area.