On Wed, 11 Apr 2007 17:44:16 -0600, Bryan Derksen
<bryan.derksen(a)shaw.ca> wrote:
That's an uncivil and overly categorical way of
saying your opinion differs.
You say. Me, I feel that this has been a complete waste of
everybody's time. People who know copyright have generally erred on
the side of excluding the list *in its entirety* as being covered by
compilation copyright, just like the AFI 100 lists which have recently
been removed following almost identical discussions, and the balance
is philosophical argument about whether we believe it *should* be
copyrightable.
The ironic thing is that if the show considered it significant and put
it on their website, the copyright violation would e unambiguous, so
the only reason the argument exists at all is because the show
considers it too trivial to post on their site.
Guy (JzG)
--
http://www.chapmancentral.co.uk
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User:JzG